Note that the Big-Bang theory does not hold water, and many scientists know it very well.We are certain the first translators have added little "mechanical touch" to the entire picture, in order to make some sense out of those incredibly advanced ideas.The Universe continues to expand for billions of years, then it will stop its motion; next, it will start collapsing.In other words, we understand the science of the Universe only if it is explained "mechanically".It starts with a single, invisible point--named a "singularity" by some scientists--which contains the entire mass of the Universe, including space and time.Next, the little invisible point explodes with a "Big Bang", then matter, space, and time appear as we know them.This is our actual level of Civilization: mechanical!Fact is, the wave sounds do not travel through vacuum--they cannot do it.Today, when a new star is born, there is no Bang at all.The "Big Bang" theory says: the Universe has a cyclic evolution.Therefore, why should it be such a Big Bang the very first time when there was actually no space/vacuum at all?
In reality, things are far from being mechanical in nature, and we have no doubt this aspect is perfectly well documented in the original Veda poems.A "Big Bang" suggests a mechanical explosion, and this "mechanical picture" makes perfect sense to most of us.Now, if it was a Big Bang or not, this is totally not important.However, this absurd naming used reflects perfectly well our actual capacity to understand reality.The collapsing of the Universe continues until a new singularity point is formed, and a new cycle is "bound" to start again.However, the problem is, we cannot understand what is not mechanical in nature.Of course, matter appears as basic atomic particles/components at first, and they need to group themselves together to form atoms, molecules, stars, planetary systems, and in the end the galaxies.The Big Bang theory was explained the first time after the Indian Veda poems were translated and published in 18 Please note this: that translation was performed according to our mechanical capacity of understanding the Universe.
In reality, things are far from being mechanical in nature, and we have no doubt this aspect is perfectly well documented in the original Veda poems.A "Big Bang" suggests a mechanical explosion, and this "mechanical picture" makes perfect sense to most of us.Now, if it was a Big Bang or not, this is totally not important.However, this absurd naming used reflects perfectly well our actual capacity to understand reality.The collapsing of the Universe continues until a new singularity point is formed, and a new cycle is "bound" to start again.However, the problem is, we cannot understand what is not mechanical in nature.Of course, matter appears as basic atomic particles/components at first, and they need to group themselves together to form atoms, molecules, stars, planetary systems, and in the end the galaxies.The Big Bang theory was explained the first time after the Indian Veda poems were translated and published in 18 Please note this: that translation was performed according to our mechanical capacity of understanding the Universe.
